
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Chapter 7 Question 2</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374645</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 13:21:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 GLACUHO</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.glacuho.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1374645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Chapter 7 Question 2</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374645</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374645</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span id="docs-internal-guid-14baa8bd-8a2c-34e0-2d13-197d3b3f6ddb"><span style="color: #000000; background-color: transparent;">How secure do you feel in your office to challenge your peers? Or, does your office strive to seek consensus rather than dissent?</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374666</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374666</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In my current office, I feel pretty comfortable challenging my peers.  I think our best ideas have come about when we've shared ideas and made suggestions to one another to make them better, so I agree with Grant's viewpoint here.  I think within many offices I've worked in challenging peers has been relatively accepted and appreciated.  Challenging those above or below me have not always been as acceptable.  In these environments, the status quo (even when originally was requested) was ultimately preferred.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
