
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Chapter 3 Question 2</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371339</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:16:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 GLACUHO</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.glacuho.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1371339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Chapter 3 Question 2</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371339</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371339</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span id="docs-internal-guid-a78cd629-3bcb-6a96-0d87-5fd47498f8c5"><span style="color: #000000; background-color: transparent;">What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option for handling a dissatisfying situation? How have you seen these options play out?</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374681</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374681</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have experienced all four options (exit, voice, persistence, and neglect) in my personal and professional life.  I agree with the author that the only choices providing improvement are voice and exit.  Much like being innovative, taking that first leap in both voice and exit are the hardest, but once you do, a clear path becomes available to you.]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 20:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
