
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Chapter 3 Question 1</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371338</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 13:34:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 22:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 GLACUHO</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.glacuho.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1371338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Chapter 3 Question 1</title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371338</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371338</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<span id="docs-internal-guid-a78cd629-3bca-8fb2-ba39-5c04a7b6a55e"><span style="color: #000000; background-color: transparent;">What factors  affected Carmen Medina’s progress towards enacting Intellipedia? Have you had a similar experience trying to make change? What was that like? What did you learn from it?</span></span>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371755</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371755</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Persistence and having allies pays off.  When you desire to make a change, understanding who in an organization has a voice that others listen to and implanting the message with that person is often the fastest way to enact change.  Additionally, have "the meeting outside the meeting" or understanding who's on each side of an argument for or against change can allow a united front when the changes plays out in front of others.<br /><br />In my career, I have seen a few times where staff members had what I would consider a legitimate concern that had not been addressed before.  Typically, when they were unsuccessful at getting it done it was because their voice was not respected at the table or they hadn't done the ground work of understanding who was for or against an idea and why before presenting it for consideration. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374239</link>
<guid>https://www.glacuho.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1374239</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Agent Medina was missing a "spear-carrier" early in her attempts with Intellipedia.  Lee Bolman and Terrance Deal describe spear-carriers as people with influence who can help make change.  Eventually, she gained more influence and she became her own spear-carrier later in her career and got Intellipedia implemented.  I believe Grant under-described her challenge with being a woman and trying to do something creative with technology, which is not a field in which there are many known women innovators.  ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
